Joined
·
213 Posts
Well, it's that time of the year again where I begin pondering if I should let one of my guns go. Back in march I picked up a PT1911 which I'm in love with and use for my fall-winter carry. I also have a PT145 (DAO) for spring-summer. The problem is not with the .45s but more with the .9mm.
I have two, a PT111 millennium pro (3rd gen) and a Ruger P89. Before I continue, I realize that this is a Taurus site. However, it seems to me that guys around here know their guns. I am confident that I can get a somewhat unbiased answer
. Anyhow, both are excellent pistols, I just don't know if I really need two 9mm.
The Ruger is my very first gun and holds a very sentimental value for me. It shoots wonderfully, is built "Tonka" tough and is easy to maintain. It is sadly, a bit bulky for concealed carry. I did manage for awhile until the summer months hit. That's when I got my original PT111 Mill Pro (DAO), then quickly traded it up for the more powerful PT145 (friend's suggestion). After a year without the PT111 :-[, I stumbled on a great deal for a NIB PT111 Mill Pro SA/DA. My compulsion could not be restrained and for $225. (including tax) she was mine once again.
Today I took the PT111 out of the safe and carried her instead of the PT145. First, I noticed the weight difference from the .45. I also noticed how well it carried in my small of back holster (really a nylon passport I carry tucked inside) under a T-shirt. It really is a nice gun, I'm just confused.
I know the P89 makes for a good home protection gun, but with a Ruger Gp100, PT1911, Mossberg 20 gauge (w/personal defense loads) and a Marlin 336 (.30-30) in my room. I think I'm pretty well covered. So, am I just really being a sentimental fool?
I have two, a PT111 millennium pro (3rd gen) and a Ruger P89. Before I continue, I realize that this is a Taurus site. However, it seems to me that guys around here know their guns. I am confident that I can get a somewhat unbiased answer
The Ruger is my very first gun and holds a very sentimental value for me. It shoots wonderfully, is built "Tonka" tough and is easy to maintain. It is sadly, a bit bulky for concealed carry. I did manage for awhile until the summer months hit. That's when I got my original PT111 Mill Pro (DAO), then quickly traded it up for the more powerful PT145 (friend's suggestion). After a year without the PT111 :-[, I stumbled on a great deal for a NIB PT111 Mill Pro SA/DA. My compulsion could not be restrained and for $225. (including tax) she was mine once again.
Today I took the PT111 out of the safe and carried her instead of the PT145. First, I noticed the weight difference from the .45. I also noticed how well it carried in my small of back holster (really a nylon passport I carry tucked inside) under a T-shirt. It really is a nice gun, I'm just confused.
I know the P89 makes for a good home protection gun, but with a Ruger Gp100, PT1911, Mossberg 20 gauge (w/personal defense loads) and a Marlin 336 (.30-30) in my room. I think I'm pretty well covered. So, am I just really being a sentimental fool?