Kel Tec fans

No big deal guys. For instance, short statured guys like myself with small short fingers can get a better grip on the single stack better than the double column magazine pistols. I'd rather carry,say,a S&W 908, CS9, Kahr K9, or the Kel-tecPF9 for that alone. With most of the single stacks grip and control are worth more than worrying about a few extra rounds for us short people. I would just carry an extra magazine or two if I thought more extra ammo was necessary. Since Wisconsin doesn't have CCW and never will, that is not a consideration at all. Went with the double column magazined pistols that fit, but just barely. House protection or in the field open carry is why I have mine. Extra ammo is then more of a real world consideration when needed. And Kel-tec is catering to the single stack crowd who like them and do not want to carry a double one. May be prejudice and not totally needed, but Keltec is filling the "niche" that others feel they have a need to have and that suits them just fine. For you double stack fans. Have fun with what you have and be satisfied. Might give others that same consideration. I have a 85CH 5 shot revolver. I would carry, and do keep Bianchi Speedstrips and a speedloader or 2 with backup ammo. I would feel just fine using this as a summer time CCW carry firearm to protect my hide in the Milwaukee Metro area. What one is proficient with is what one should carry and that goes for what ever the pick to carry. Don't feel that anyone is dumping on others who carry smaller quanitites of ammo, but there is a reason that some chose lesser ammo carrying pistols or revolvers.

Here's a picture of my Kel-Tecs.The top one is a P-11 Stainless no longer made,lower right is a P-32 with serial #00048 and the first generation P3AT.on the left
Art

That's a great deal and like Steelheart, I'd jump all over it even though I don't particularly like .32ACP if I found one at that price. ;D

I carry a little NAA for backup, .22 mini revolver in a folding "holster grip" in my weak hand pocket. The .32 is an upgrade from that, I guess, but I like that little thing, comes in handy for vermin and such from time to time. I've even taken sitting rabbits with it at short range.

I don't like the minimal penetration of the .32, especially with hollow points. I don't like the FMJs for lack of tissue disruption, so it's sort of a catch .22, I guess. I think of the .32 much as I do the .22 or .25, an eye socket gun. Aim for the eye sockets. Just forget center mass. The good news is that the little P32 is pretty accurate at handshake ranges and it's easier to control than the more powerful P3AT in .380.

I have a little .380, but rarely carry even that as a primary. I'm much happier with a .38 special or the 9mm +Ps in my P11. But, it's good to have a tiny gun for when you just can't carry anything bigger. The P3AT and P32 are such guns, can conceal even in the slimmest of pockets. I'd like to have one just because of that, but I doubt I'd carry it often. They do have more whop than my little NAA. There wasn't a little gun like the P32 except for the quite expensive and elusive (like a 2 year waiting list) little Seecamp .32 back when I bought my NAA. If there had been a P32, I probably would have gotten one, not that I don't like my NAA, neat little cap gun and it takes care of business pretty well. I've even head shot snakes with it at close range. It's more accurate than people give it credit for, but I never realized how accurate it was until I got the holster grip for it. It was danged near unshootable without that holster grip, just too tiny.