I remember having a discussion long ago with a higher level employee that I knew at a major magazine publishing company about story content and glowing reviews of products, and their answer was just the answer that I thought would come out of their mouths:
"We have to give good to glowing reviews of those items we review, and do our best to overlook many of the flaws those items may have, for one simple reason: advertising dollars from the manufacturer of the item we are reviewing. It has NOTHING to do with the reality of whether the product in question really is garbage or great, it has everything to do with the all mighty dollar. And for writers that have NO CLUE about the subject matter they are writing about, and implement falsehoods about that subject, we try to edit their stories to more closely align with the truth about the subject matter as much as possible, but sometimes glaring examples of facts that are just wrong do get through, because sometimes those stories came at the editor at the last minute, and are not reviewed as well as they should be."
A prime example of this 'glowing review' of every item that was reviewed was Skin Diver magazine in its heyday. Everything that they reviewed, whether everyone in the industry knew that the item was garbage or great, was "the newest and greatest thing", and everyone needed to upgrade their gear to include this item or purchase this item to add to their gear. It was all about the advertising dollar controlling the story, not the facts about the item. And I have found the same things, to some extent, in Guns and Ammo magazine, and with many of their authors over the years. Many write opinion pieces that you, the reader, are supposed to take as fact.
And now you know why I hardly ever read a magazine anymore, and rely more on websites like The Truth About Guns and others that are not beholden to advertising dollars.
"We have to give good to glowing reviews of those items we review, and do our best to overlook many of the flaws those items may have, for one simple reason: advertising dollars from the manufacturer of the item we are reviewing. It has NOTHING to do with the reality of whether the product in question really is garbage or great, it has everything to do with the all mighty dollar. And for writers that have NO CLUE about the subject matter they are writing about, and implement falsehoods about that subject, we try to edit their stories to more closely align with the truth about the subject matter as much as possible, but sometimes glaring examples of facts that are just wrong do get through, because sometimes those stories came at the editor at the last minute, and are not reviewed as well as they should be."
A prime example of this 'glowing review' of every item that was reviewed was Skin Diver magazine in its heyday. Everything that they reviewed, whether everyone in the industry knew that the item was garbage or great, was "the newest and greatest thing", and everyone needed to upgrade their gear to include this item or purchase this item to add to their gear. It was all about the advertising dollar controlling the story, not the facts about the item. And I have found the same things, to some extent, in Guns and Ammo magazine, and with many of their authors over the years. Many write opinion pieces that you, the reader, are supposed to take as fact.
And now you know why I hardly ever read a magazine anymore, and rely more on websites like The Truth About Guns and others that are not beholden to advertising dollars.