Joined
·
213 Posts
* no bashing, just facts or solid opinions (prove we can be better than the rest 8) )
Not really a fan of their design. I have had the chance to shoot a Glock 36 once at a firing range once, I found the grip to be a bit uncomfortable and the recoil a bit harsh (.45 acp). While I do not (can't) argue the fact that they are a well made pistol, my exposure to them has been limited. Even so, I just can't seem to warm up to them. I have read comparisons of the Glock to other firearms on their home site as well as some others. Now I think it's time to hear from the Taurus guys.
How do Glocks compare and contrast to the Taurus line of polymer pistols i.e. Millennium Pro line and 24/7 especially?
Do you really get what you pay for, or are you getting more for your money?
Are the Glock faithful truly obsessive, or are they on to something?
Not really a fan of their design. I have had the chance to shoot a Glock 36 once at a firing range once, I found the grip to be a bit uncomfortable and the recoil a bit harsh (.45 acp). While I do not (can't) argue the fact that they are a well made pistol, my exposure to them has been limited. Even so, I just can't seem to warm up to them. I have read comparisons of the Glock to other firearms on their home site as well as some others. Now I think it's time to hear from the Taurus guys.
How do Glocks compare and contrast to the Taurus line of polymer pistols i.e. Millennium Pro line and 24/7 especially?
Do you really get what you pay for, or are you getting more for your money?
Are the Glock faithful truly obsessive, or are they on to something?