Having owned both and having put 1000 rds thru my G3C and 3800 thru my G3 here are my conclusions ( based on a small sample!)
- The G3C obviously is the result of along line of product improved compact pistols from Taurus and it shows.
Great reliability, no issues with magazines, no issues with feeding or ejecting, no matter what the Ammo even some of my worst Ammo seems to work fine.
Class leading ergonomics and shooting performance for a compact pistol.
- The G3 is Taurus full size, yet along the lines of the millennium pro compact pistols. I love the accuracy and speed that the superior ergonomics of of a full size handgun anointed with taurus excellent ergonomics offers.
Yet in my service it has not matched the high reliability of the G3C.
If ammo is in any way marginal we get feeding errors and the magazines had weak springs that would completely fail to push the ammo up some some types.
I am not 100% if this was the magazines that came with the gun or the mecgar magazines I bought speratly from a vendor but my gut tells me it was a mix of both (however have no proof of this.
So the form and function of the G3 is superior simply due to being a fullsize version of the G3C the reliability is not.
These guns can be reliable but you must do two things, - replace mag springs ( or be lucky enough to catch a "good batch" ) and shoot ammo that you identified a working well with your gun.
Now there appear to be many users with no issues at all with their G3s.
This may be explained in two ways;
Incidentally here is a comparison of both feed ramps.
I do not know why there was a need to make both different but i could speculate that since the G3C came after the G3 the enlarged feed ramp may be a product improvement step by Taurus for the G3C.
G3 on left G3C on right.
I think it is clear which gun might feed more reliably with a greater variety of ammo...
- The G3C obviously is the result of along line of product improved compact pistols from Taurus and it shows.
Great reliability, no issues with magazines, no issues with feeding or ejecting, no matter what the Ammo even some of my worst Ammo seems to work fine.
Class leading ergonomics and shooting performance for a compact pistol.
- The G3 is Taurus full size, yet along the lines of the millennium pro compact pistols. I love the accuracy and speed that the superior ergonomics of of a full size handgun anointed with taurus excellent ergonomics offers.
Yet in my service it has not matched the high reliability of the G3C.
If ammo is in any way marginal we get feeding errors and the magazines had weak springs that would completely fail to push the ammo up some some types.
I am not 100% if this was the magazines that came with the gun or the mecgar magazines I bought speratly from a vendor but my gut tells me it was a mix of both (however have no proof of this.
So the form and function of the G3 is superior simply due to being a fullsize version of the G3C the reliability is not.
These guns can be reliable but you must do two things, - replace mag springs ( or be lucky enough to catch a "good batch" ) and shoot ammo that you identified a working well with your gun.
Now there appear to be many users with no issues at all with their G3s.
This may be explained in two ways;
- they had the right ammo from the get-go
- they do not shoot enough to wear out magazine springs
Incidentally here is a comparison of both feed ramps.
I do not know why there was a need to make both different but i could speculate that since the G3C came after the G3 the enlarged feed ramp may be a product improvement step by Taurus for the G3C.
G3 on left G3C on right.
I think it is clear which gun might feed more reliably with a greater variety of ammo...