Taurus Firearm Forum banner

FNH-USA FS2000 Tactical

3K views 5 replies 6 participants last post by  niko 
#1 ·
FNH-USA FS2000 Tactical 5.56x45 (.223) Semi-Auto Bullpup Carbine



by Jeff Quinn

photography by Jeff Quinn & Boge Quinn

July 3rd, 2008



FNH-USA continues to impress me with their wide variety of handguns, rifles, and shotguns that are built for military and law enforcement uses. All of the FNH weapons are overbuilt for ruggedness and durability in the toughest conditions, and for that reason, they are also ideally suited for use by the rest of us as well. It really grates upon my nerves when a self-proclaimed expert tries to tell us that the average citizen does not need the same weapons as do law enforcement officers. They say that the police need high-capacity autoloaders, but that the ordinary homeowner does not. This is probably the opposite of the truth. A law enforcement officer usually has backup just moments away. A man defending his home from a forceful invasion does not. Some categorize “police” and “civilians”. This too is incorrect. The police are civilians. They are hired to protect us from the dregs of humanity, and on the whole, they do a good job. However, unless you have your own private cop at your side all day, everyday, you must protect yourself and those for whom you are responsible. In a home invasion or out on some lonely back road, you are on your own. The police cannot be everywhere, and therefore, the average citizen needs at his disposal the ability and hardware to defend himself and his family. Keeping all this in mind, those weapons that are often categorized as “tactical” and marketed towards law enforcement are exactly what is needed when a man must be his own police officer, which is almost always the case when it comes to defending against a violent attack. I have stated this before, but it bears repeating: the police are not going to be at your side when an attack occurs. Even if you live in a city where the response time is very good, help is at least five minutes away, that is, if you have time to make the call. As I have also used to illustrate my point before, do this simple exercise. Imagine that your front door is kicked in. Grab the phone, pretend to call 911, and then sit down and look at the clock for a full five minutes. A lot can happen in five minutes. The police can show up and draw a little chalk line around your body, and around the bodies of those that are dearest to you. Thinking of stuff like this is distasteful to most of us, and hard to even contemplate, but in our society, self defense is something for which we should prepare, and hope to never need, just like car insurance, only on a much graver scale. I stated the above to illustrate the need that each of us has for “tactical” type weapons. I prefer to call them fighting weapons myself, as “tactical” is a term that is greatly overused, and often misused. While sporting and fighting weapons can overlap and sometimes interchange, they differ in their characteristics and handling qualities. For instance, while a high-dollar Italian double shotgun that is built for clay target shooting can be used to defend against a home invader, a much shorter, handier shotgun with greater firepower is preferred. Same with handguns. An Olympic free-style target pistol is excellent for punching holes in paper, but is not well-suited to hiding under a lightweight jacket. A compact .45 Auto is much better as a fighting gun. There are many in our government who believe that we do not need to own fighting guns, and at least one of our Presidential contenders for the 2008 election has stated that he intends to work towards banning semi-auto weapons from civilian ownership in the USA, if he is elected, and he probably will be. Just for the record, I don’t have a lot of confidence in the other guy either. It just seems that elitist politicians, who enjoy the protection of around-the-clock armed guards, often forget that the average citizen must protect himself.

That brings us back to the topic at hand; fighting weapons, and more specifically the subject of this review, the FS2000 carbine from FNH-USA. As stated above, FNH makes some excellent fighting weapons. The FS2000 is a semi-auto version of FNH’s F2000 carbine. The FS2000 is a Bullpup design, meaning that it has no conventional buttstock as do most carbines, but that the receiver of the carbine is at the rear of the weapon, resulting in a much reduced overall length, while still incorporating a carbine-length barrel. Being a left-handed shooter, I have never been able to shoot Bullpup carbines before, as most eject out the right side, which would mean that the hot empty cases would be inserted into my ear canal. There have been a couple of Bullpup designs which allow for changing from right-hand to left-hand ejection, but it involves changing out some internal parts. The FS2000 has resolved this problem by ejecting the fired cases out the front of the carbine, on the upper right side of the stock and below the front sight. The fired cases eject through a tube that runs atop the barrel inside the upper receiver section of the carbine. At the ejection port is a hinged cover that remains closed until four shots have been fired, at which time it opens and begins dumping the fired cases to the right front of the shooter. This is an excellent feature. On the firing line, the cases are being ejected to the front, and are not hitting another shooter to the side of the weapon. This is important both on the range and in a fight. It is also noteworthy that by not flinging the empty cases upon the ground for the first few shots, if only a couple or three shots are needed to accomplish the job, there are no empty cases lying upon the ground. Depending upon the situation, this may or may not be of importance. Besides the desire that we not litter, leaving fired cartridge cases with fingerprints upon them might, in some situations, be something that we do not want to do. Anyway, I like this feature of the FS2000.

The FS2000 version reviewed here has a set of good, adjustable backup sights, but wears a long Picatinny rail atop the receiver for the mounting of an optical sight, such as a scope or illuminated dot sight. The FS2000 has a barrel that is approximately sixteen inches in length, with a very effective muzzle brake attached, resulting in a total length of the barrel with brake measuring seventeen and three-eighths inches. The gas system has a piston rod running along the left side of the barrel inside of the upper receiver. The gas system has a two-position lever to allow for reliable functioning should the weapon become excessively filthy or when using weak ammunition. Good idea. The FS2000 uses readily available AR-15/M-16 thirty-round magazines. There is also a version available with a ten-round magazine for those who are legally limited to that capacity. The magazine release is ambidextrous and easy to use. The magazines does not fall free of the weapon, but must be pulled from the receiver to prevent inadvertently dumping a magazine. The motion to remove the magazine is very natural. Just by reaching and grabbing the magazine, the release is activated by the hand. The safety is also ambidextrous and easy to use, even while wearing gloves. The safety is located conveniently just below the trigger. The cocking handle is on the left side, and can be locked into the open position with an upwards motion, similar to the H&K design. It is very easy to use and quick into action. The trigger pull on the sample rifle measured just over seven pounds. It is a very smooth-feeling pull, and feels lighter than it measures. Trigger travel is about one-half inch, and much like a light double-action revolver's pull in feel. At the rear of the upper receiver is a flip-up inspection port to view the condition of the weapon’s action.

Field stripping the FS2000 is very easy to do without tools. The cross pin for disassembly is large and rectangular in section, and is retained in the receiver to prevent loss. Pressing the pin out to the left allows the upper section of the receiver to slide forward, taking with it the barrel and gas system. The bolt carrier/operating rod can then be pulled forward and out of the receiver. The procedure is very simple and straightforward. Both sections of the receiver are made of plastic, vertically split and held together with through bolts. I made no attempt to take the halves apart, as it is not necessary for cleaning or lubrication of the carbine.

The ergonomics of the FS2000 are very good. The carbine weighs seven pounds, nine and one-half ounces unloaded, and measures just a hair over twenty-nine inches in length. This makes for a very handy size to maneuver in tight quarters such as a hallway or the inside of a vehicle.

For shooting the FS2000, I mounted a 3.5 power Trijicon ACOG scope atop the Picatinny rail. The ACOG is compact, rugged, and ideally suited for the FS2000, and the combination worked very well. The ACOG has a tritium-illuminated reticle that never needs batteries, and works well in any lighting condition, from bright sunlight to almost total darkness. For accuracy testing, I mounted a Leupold 6.5 to 20 power scope attached with an ArmaLite mount. This scope is used as my “mule” scope for accuracy testing. I trust it, and it has never let me down. The Bullpup configuration and smooth, flowing curves of the FS2000 made bench shooting difficult, as it was hard to get it to lie within the rifle rest. However, I was able to fire some pretty good groups from the carbine. The accuracy of the FS2000 was very good with most ammunition, and even better with a couple of loads. Most of the mil-spec ammo grouped into about two to two-and-one-half inches at 100 yards, but Winchester USA 62 grain ammo performed much better, and would keep five shots under one and three-quarters inches. At longer distances, I used the ACOG on the FS2000 to plink at rocks and such. Offhand shooting is the carbine’s forte, and it proved exceptionally easy to shoot well. Reliability of the FS2000 was perfect during testing, when I didn’t screw up by not fully inserting the magazine. Like with an AR, a good tap on the bottom of the magazine will assure that it is fully seated.

While not designed to be a sporting weapon, the FS2000 possesses the accuracy needed for predator hunting for use on coyotes and such, and can be used as a walking varminter for groundhogs, crows, and beaver. Using the right bullet, the .223 is very useful for hunting whitetail deer where legal to do so, and it would be fun to see the look on the game warden’s face when he checked the rifle. As a competitive rifle for tactical-type competition, the FS2000 should serve well, as it is compact and easy to shoot. However, the FS2000 is built for more serious purposes, and is a good choice for someone wanting a reliable, compact 5.56mm alternative to the AR-15. It is shorter and handier in tight quarters, totally ambidextrous, and is probably the best Bullpup ever built. I like it.

At the time of this writing, the MSRP on the FS2000 Tactical is $2773.27, which ain’t cheap, but if you are in the market for a Bullpup 5.56mm carbine, you never regret buying the best.

Check out the FS2000 and other products from FNH-USA online at www.fnhusa.com.

For the location of an FNH dealer near you, click on the DEALER LOCATOR at www.lipseys.com.

To buy the FS2000 online, go to www.galleryofguns.com.

To look at the excellent ACOG and Leupold scopes, go to www.trijicon.com and www.leupold.com.

Jeff Quinn


FNH-USA's FS2000 Semi-Auto Bullpup Carbine.
 
See less See more
1
#2 ·
~Lets Get Back To Reality~AK74~
5.45x39...Remember, its the AMMO that cost more than the GUN over time... Do a Caliber cost analysis before your final decision, especially on a Gun you want to have some FUN with at the Range......<:)) For Hunting, cost per Cartrage is not an issue...!!! "One Shot One Kill"...

~5.45x39 AMMO~ADD IT UP~Way Cheaper to Shoot than a AR~
~The cheapest prices for 1080 round of Military Surplus is:~
$129.82 from http://www.jgsales.com/product_info...-sealed-tin-/cPath/12_37/products_id/1399?SID
$125.00 from http://rguns.net/008_3.html
$119.95 from http://www.aimsurplus.com/acatalog/Bulgari....545x39_FMJ.html
$118.80 from http://www.southernohiogun.com/ammo.htm


~Go Ahead~Do It~You Know You Want To~From this Gun, to the Gun Below~
Romanian AK-47 5.45x39
http://www.auctionarms.com/search/displayitem.cfm?itemnum=8690006
~Romanian AK 74 5.45 X 39 Cal. -- 30 Rd. Hi Cap. Mag.
http://www.auctionarms.com/search/displayitem.cfm?itemnum=8670951
~Polish Tantal AK-74 CAI rifle, 5.45x39 caliber
http://www.jgsales.com/product_info...4-cai-rifle,-5-45x39-caliber/products_id/1648
Lots of Pages of AK STUFF
http://search.cheaperthandirt.com/s...ields=price&getfields=image&oe=UTF-8&filter=p
Stock Kit
http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/AKS228-63892-1872.html




 
#3 ·
At 2400 a pop for their bullpup I'll stick with my AR's. As for the 5.45X39, it's an interesting round, but the inexpensive ammo hinders other bullet manufacturers from producing good varmint loads for the caliber. For those of us who likes to make prarrie dogs dance it's a hinderance. But for sheer plinking pleasure you are right Knuckles only .22's are cheaper.
 
#4 ·
not sure about hte "tactical" variant but i've seen fs2000's go for as cheap as 1600 locally.. usually they're around 1800-1900

just like the p90 i dont like the caliber, iirc 5.56x45mm was originally designed with a steel cone which was used for penetrating armor.

this makes sense on the battle field but i dont even think you can get those on the civilian market.

eh anyway not a lot of guns chamber that around so i'd rather go with something more mainstream.. i kinda like bullpup designs..

if i had 2400 to blow on a rifle i'd be looking for aug clone.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top