Why do people say Taurus revolvers suck? - Page 5
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 51
Like Tree89Likes

Thread: Why do people say Taurus revolvers suck?

  1. #41
    Senior Member
    Member #
    86
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Broadview Heights, Ohio
    Posts
    528
    Liked
    197 times
    I’ve had 12 Taurus Revolvers. I think they are very good.
    Two Revolvers every day all day

  2. #42
    Member
    Member #
    35468
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    74
    Liked
    41 times
    Quote Originally Posted by G Love View Post
    I have S&Ws and Ruger revolvers, and never considered a Taurus before, because what people on the online gun forums say.

    I have a S&W model 66, and with the Taurus 65 and 66s being very similar to it, at least in appearance, out of curiosity I bought and just received yesterday a new Taurus model 65 -in black.
    After checking the timing, the barrel to chamber alignment, the barrel/cylinder gap, the end shake and everything else, this gun is absolutely perfect, and I almost always find some little thing wrong on new S&W and Ruger revolvers.
    I've had a new S&W with a crooked barrel, and a new Ruger that the chambers didn't align with the barrel, had a .010" cylinder gap, and had other problems with those two gun makers.

    What are the problems I will have with my Taurus 65 that aren't likely on my S&Ws or Rugers? Do they wear out fast, or break prematurely or something?
    Taurus has taken a hit over their recent customer service fiasco over the Millennium series. They KNEW the guns would break, and did nothing until they were sued. Videos on line with a Taurus being held by the end of the grip- shaken and firing each time it is shaken. You can find complaints about Colt, S&W, DW...etc Taurus revolvers seem to be one of the most reliable pistols on the market. Customer service on new stuff is good. It is ALWAYS disappointing to get a new pistol and it have problems- sours everybody. If you are referring to USED guns- all that depends upon cleaning, maintenance, abuse... and OBTW- 90% of the LGS employees have wrong opinions about most everything. Especially he "FanBoys" ;-)

  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Member #
    31412
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Allen, Tx
    Posts
    145
    Liked
    91 times
    I’ve had and have several Taurus handguns, mostly revolvers. I’ve had cylinder screws fall out ant it took a couple months to replace. I’ve also had a 44Mag’s frame “stretch” from normal use -no super hot loads. Checked with Taurus and sent it back for repair which took a minute to get back. I’ve also helped people with their revolvers that “locked up” with live rounds in the cylinder.

    They’re inexpensive guns built on licenses from the likes of Beretta and Smith. As a general rule they’re good guns that lack the fit and finish of their parent guns. There are times the metals are sub-par but those are extremely rare.

    I do on occasion use the 44 for hunting, but won’t use it as a bear defense gun, I have a G20 and 40 for that.
    CDR_Glock likes this.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    TaurusArmed.net
    Advertisements
     

  5. #44
    Junior Member
    Member #
    58449
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Central Wisc.
    Posts
    11
    Liked
    17 times
    I sell guns at a large retail store. If a customer is looking for a revolver I will show them all I have including the Taurus models.

    I own a Taurus revolver and have had zero issues.

    What gets me is that some of the other gun guys I work with will bad mouth the Taurus right off the get go to the customer.

    I believe that the customer should make up his or her mind based on what I recommend and and what suits their purpose, either price or function.

    I had one customer bring a very old Taurus revolver that he had inherited and had a bad lock up timing.

    Taurus repaired it free of charge and did it with quick turn around.

    I guess it's like trucks.

    If I own a Chevy and you got a Ford then you got a piece of crap. Or if it is not a Sig then it's a piece of crap too...

    Same thing about the Hi points too.

    Yeah, they are big, heavy, ugly, poor finish and cheap, but they will run too.
    When the policeman asked her why she shot the robber 6 times, she said because it went click the 7th time.

  6. #45
    Member
    Member #
    71113
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    48
    Liked
    75 times
    My 1989 4" Blued Taurus Model 66 is what I want in my hand when it comes to 'Life or Death'.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Give me a 'T' for Texas, Give me a 'T' for Tennessee
    Native Texan - Long Time Tennessean

  7. #46
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    76027
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    NW Oregon
    Posts
    30
    Liked
    15 times
    Double Actions, two Colt, five Charter, four Ruger, three S&W, and two Taurus. So I have others to experience. I am not a hardcore revolver guy like my son, but I like my Taurus, a 605 bought new in 2003 0r 2004, ATI Grip stocks, and a used 99 vintage Model 66, a stainless 4" seven shooter, square butt wood stocks. I have not shot the 66 much, maybe 100 rounds, but it seems good to me.
    Qwiks draw and CDR_Glock like this.

  8. #47
    Senior Member
    Member #
    75143
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    137
    Liked
    145 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Fatboy46 View Post
    You can find complaints about Colt, S&W, DW...etc It is ALWAYS disappointing to get a new pistol and it have problems- sours everybody. and OBTW- 90% of the LGS employees have wrong opinions about most everything. Especially he "FanBoys" ;-)
    A couple of years ago I posted something on another forum about one problem after another I had with a G26 gen 4 and ended up personally taking it to the Glock factory for repair or replacement since I live about 45 minutes away.

    It was a good thing we don't post under our real names because some of the die hard FANBOYS, and I do mean SUPER FANBOYS, started attacking me with a vengeance I couldn't believe. If they knew my name and address I'm sure a few would have come knocking on my door for such heresy.

    They couldn't accept the fact that a Glock, any Glock could possibly have a problem of the magnitude I was describing. It certainly couldn't be the gun, it had to be me because I don't know the hole in my backside from the one in my head. One of the most vocal fanboys got banned because it was so bad.

    The technician at Glock who worked on the gun replaced just about everything in it. When I asked him how or why it was like that he said, "Sometimes even with us, an occasional gun just gets past quality control and in the hands of a buyer that shouldn't have been approved. We're really sorry."

    It can occur with any manufacturer. CA-CA just happens. I've not had one problem with the Taurus revolvers that I own. (856UL and 605) On the other hand, my brother has a much older Taurus 9mm that was terrible. He retired it and got a Ruger LC9s pro before the EC9s came out. It's the nature of guns I guess.
    GhostHorse likes this.

  9. #48
    Senior Member
    Member #
    1005
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    North Alabama Foothills
    Posts
    12,784
    Liked
    11150 times
    LOL, I sometimes have to remind the Glock worshipers that Jesus did not come from Austria, Hitler did.

    QA is an elusive target. I once worked for a General who was the Army's Expert on TQM (Total Quality Management), as such I had to read most of the QA writings of the time. I still use Demming's TQM teachings to find my way through dealing with bureaucracies. Bottomline is QA must be constant and continual, yet many places relax once they reach their QA goal, or achieve certification. Alabama Football is one of the few places where I rarely see them relax in pursuit of QA, even when coming off a national championship. That is one reason I love to read/hear Coach Saban's thoughts on the process and leadership. Every time they raise the bar, it becomes the new standard, not a peak.

    As such, I can tell you that I sent back to Ruger a SR-40C because the safety broke. The gunsmith working on it told me that there were defective parts in that gun that the factory had recorded as removed from inventory over a year earlier. He was mystified as to how the part got in that series gun, and went over the gun in detail to see if there were any other defective parts in it. (If they found any more, they did not tell me.) I like the gun I got back and have not had a problem with it since.

    I have a Rock River Arms .458 SOCOM upper that I had to send back because it was having issues chambering rounds. As it turned out, chamber reamers on the SOCOM are pretty short lived, and my .458 SOCOM barrel was reamed by a reamer that should have been pulled, consequently it left chatter marks in the chamber, and that barrel should never have gotten out of the factory. RRA is known for their QA, yet this one got through several inspections without notice. They re-reamed the barrel chamber with a new reamer, polished it and then returned it to me.

    I don't get mad when something is not right, but I do pay attention to how the maker reacts these problems and corrects them. Failure Analysis is an important part of any QA program. You can not fix something if you don't know why it broke. Yet, many companies never perform failure analysis due to cost, so you can not expect them to get batter. And I know some QA people consider a return rate acceptable if it does not exceed the cost of fixing the problem.
    Qwiks draw and Iluvrevos like this.
    Battle of Wanat: 10 years ago last 13 July, 1LT Brostram was killed in combat killing the last enemy combatant in the outpost. The LT went to the point of decision and made the difference that turned the tide of the battle. The original investigation found the Bde Cmdr, the Bn Cmdr and the Co Cmdr at fault for dereliction of duty. If you want to see what a sarcastic silver star citation reads like, pull up the company commander's silver star.

  10. #49
    Member
    Member #
    13126
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    West TN
    Posts
    79
    Liked
    61 times
    Long time Taurus hand gun owner.

    Own 85’s, 617, 94, 605, 627 Tracker, and 3 PT 92’s.

    Own high end brands too, however 85 UL’s are daily carries.

    Never a problem.

    I see my Taurus’s like the difference between a Ford and a Lincoln. Both work and achieve same objective!
    Qwiks draw likes this.

  11. #50
    Senior Member
    Member #
    37505
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    12,320
    Liked
    18423 times
    Cause sometimes they do.
    JStacy likes this.

    Obama: AK-47s are for soldiers.
    Arwine: MAK-90s are for civilians.


    This world would be a much better place if people would mind their own business.
    -Me




 

 
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •