So, if the gun will be so smart, when a shoot is questionable, the gun gets blamed? Primarily they are anyway, and the shooter second, if it fits an agenda of course.
Meh, they've been talking about this for decades. It'll never happen due to the expenses involved and even if it did, nobody would buy them so they would quickly be dropped.
Worst case scenario, they give Gunsmiths a lot of business as folks come in droves asking for them to be disabled.
As I see it, there would be two tiers of weapons: One manufactured for the military and one for the civilian markets. The civilian weapons would have a "back door" built in to permit the weapons to be disabled. There would be mandatory trade-ins required.
Sound pretty tin-foil hatted. And I'm not someone who subscribes to conspiracy theories. But after the government wanted Apple and other tech companies to build "back doors" to let them bypass device encryption, this sounds pretty reasonable.
It does indeed sound reasonable, but you should also realize there are plenty of folk in the government that would want those same "features" built into the military versions as well.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Taurus Firearm Forum
3.2M posts
67.3K members
Since 2007
A forum community dedicated to Taurus firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!