Secondhand anecdotal evidence suggests that everything on the current market is bad.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree14Likes
  • 3 Post By
  • 4 Post By osbornk
  • 2 Post By NotSo
  • 4 Post By bobbojama
  • 1 Post By MOONDAWG

Thread: Secondhand anecdotal evidence suggests that everything on the current market is bad.

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Member #
    56609
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,794
    Liked
    2284 times

    Thumbs down Secondhand anecdotal evidence suggests that everything on the current market is bad.

    One of the many pitfalls of the information age is that much of the easily accessible data available is just as likely to be in accurate as it is to be inaccurate thanks to the fact that anybody can say whatever they want, and unfortunately more often than not folks are just repeating what they've heard elsewhere for lack of any firsthand experience.

    As a result, what should be a simple search for a reliable, well-made firearm becomes a baffling ordeal in which one must attempt to discern that which is factual from that which is merely overstated exaggeration based on anecdotal (often times unsubstantiated) evidence.
    Now in some cases it's rather easy to discern because all you have to do is disregard any, "I've heard/read that..." or "I know a guy who knows a guy..." posts, but sometimes folks completely neglect to preface their posts with such, thus making it appear as though they are speaking from firsthand experience rather than merely repeating what they've heard.

    This can be extremely frustrating, especially when in your search for information you see instances in which reports of product failure include very specific details which have been copy/pasted or otherwise abbreviated ad nauseam from a published article or blog post without citation.
    Even worse is when you learn this after the fact in the event in which you've already been dissuaded from buying something due to such posts.

    Frankly, as someone who has been bitten by this practice, someone who has been guilty of it myself, and is now once again having an absolutely miserable time in search of a new firearm as a result, I have decided that I for one am going to avoid being part of the problem. From this moment on, I'm going to attempt to stay out of discussions of products I lack any firsthand experience with, or at the very least be sure to always mention that what I'm saying is based entirely on hearsay. Granted that I've never been a huge offender to begin with, but it certainly won't hurt me to be more conscientious about it to ensure that I never become a contributor to worldwide web of secondhand anecdotal (often times unsubstantiated) information.
    "If you work for a living, why do you kill yourself working?" - Tuco Remírez - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
    "When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk. - Same

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Member #
    44413
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Marion, Va
    Posts
    916
    Liked
    870 times
    I had similar issues as to what was good or bad before I bought my first handgun. However, I probably did it backwards. I couldn't understand how a Hi-Point could possibly be as bad as the gun snobs portrayed it. Therefore, I bought a used C9 and found out even though it is heavy and ugly, it performed fine. I figured if they were that wrong about Hi-Point, maybe they were wrong about Taurus so I traded the Hi-Point for an old Taurus revolver. They were very wrong about Taurus and as a result, I have bought five new ones. I also had the same experience with the Phoenix HP-22A. I also have S&W as well as Ruger but I don't find them any better than my "affordable" guns like the gun snobs said they were.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Member #
    48780
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Near the navel of The Sunshine State
    Posts
    2,956
    Liked
    4636 times
    I would add, this frustration extends to just about everything anyone tries to research. Unless you are able to find a reliable source who publishes first-hand information on the subject, you will get a continuous list of pretty much the same information with each author passing themselves off as "the world's foremost authority" on any given subject. Those of us of a certain age should remember, that title is reserved for Professor Irwin Corey (for the uninformed, please see this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irwin_Corey).

    No matter your political views, fake news does exist. Characterized as parody, satire or whatever, it's cleverly disguised to conceal its true self from the casual reader, who then quotes it as gospel. And then it gets passed on as such. And Google and the other search engines contribute to the confusion, listing the search results by whomever has paid them the most.
    Whatever adjective or verb comes to mind, I am...NotSo.

    One of my goals in life is to shoot more people on purpose than I do by accident. So far, so good.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    TaurusArmed.net
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Member #
    45087
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Lee County Florida (SWFL)
    Posts
    2,778
    Liked
    4169 times
    My neighbors, friends, wifes, sister in laws, uncle says that everything you see and read on the web is factual and true... So There!
    When people lose their way and begin to vote for their own yokes and chains and suddenly we’re all wearing them, when Government turns tyrannical and the light of liberty is being extinguished.... our 2nd amendment is our ONLY hope.


  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Member #
    4800
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Republic of West Florida
    Posts
    28,876
    Liked
    29529 times
    "Everything your read on the internet is the truth" Adolph Hitler

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    olfarhors likes this.
    NULLI SECUNDUS

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Member #
    47507
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,603
    Liked
    1102 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Tuco_Ramírez View Post
    Frankly, as someone who has been bitten by this practice, someone who has been guilty of it myself, and is now once again having an absolutely miserable time in search of a new firearm as a result, I have decided that I for one am going to avoid being part of the problem. From this moment on, I'm going to attempt to stay out of discussions of products I lack any firsthand experience with, or at the very least be sure to always mention that what I'm saying is based entirely on hearsay. Granted that I've never been a huge offender to begin with, but it certainly won't hurt me to be more conscientious about it to ensure that I never become a contributor to worldwide web of secondhand anecdotal (often times unsubstantiated) information.
    "Jolly good!".....clap clap clap....."Here here!".....clap clap clap....."Capitol idea!".....clap clap clap

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Member #
    15577
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    DFW, Lone Star State
    Posts
    306
    Liked
    384 times
    Quote Originally Posted by MOONDAWG View Post
    "Everything your read on the internet is the truth" Adolph Hitler

    I know for a fact he had an AOL dial-up account. His phone records bear that out.

 

 

Home | Forum | Active Topics | What's New | Subscribed Threads | My Threads | My Posts

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •