Ohio goes beyond FDA guidance and bans Doctors from prescribing hydroxiquine for covi - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
Like Tree25Likes

Thread: Ohio goes beyond FDA guidance and bans Doctors from prescribing hydroxiquine for covi

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Member #
    1335
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    16,295
    Liked
    7095 times
    There was a a Dr. here in Texas on the news last night. She works in one of those local emergency offices. She has treated over 400 people using hydroquinone. She says it works better than anything else she has found. Who are you suppose to believe?

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Member #
    75373
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    245
    Liked
    287 times
    Quote Originally Posted by garyh View Post
    There was a a Dr. here in Texas on the news last night. She works in one of those local emergency offices. She has treated over 400 people using hydroquinone. She says it works better than anything else she has found. Who are you suppose to believe?
    Believe medical professionals who cite large, peer reviewed studies of significant populations, who have been engaged in medical science as a career path. Do not believe people who put forth unproven treatments that fit a political agenda or narrative, and in particular the subset who use lies as a weapon.

  3. #13
    Super Moderator

    Member #
    5628
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    34,857
    Liked
    46012 times
    In 2005....Fifteen years ago, this study indicates that Chloroquine is a "potent" medication for the prevention and treatment of SARS...which is also a coronavirus...also from China.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

    From the abstract:

    "Results

    We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.

    Conclusion

    Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds."
    “Historically, freedom is a rare and fragile thing . . . Freedom has cost the blood of millions in obscure places and in historic sites ranging from Gettysburg to the Gulag Archipelago . . .That something that cost so much in human lives should be surrendered piecemeal in exchange for visions and rhetoric seems grotesque. Freedom is not simply the right of intellectuals to circulate their merchandise. It is, above all, the right of ordinary people to find elbow room for themselves and a refuge from the rampaging presumptions of their ‘betters’.” Thomas Sowell

  4. Remove Advertisements
    TaurusArmed.net
    Advertisements
     

  5. #14
    Senior Member
    Member #
    3642
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,719
    Liked
    1260 times
    I think I have Malaria, prescribe Hydroxiquine for Me, Doctor "sounds good to Me".
    To the gun grabbers:
    What kind of malicious intent do You have towards Me that makes You fear the fact that I may have a firearm.

  6. #15
    Senior Member
    Member #
    31408
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Lehigh Valley PA
    Posts
    3,836
    Liked
    5822 times
    Quote Originally Posted by unclenunzie View Post
    Believe medical professionals who cite large, peer reviewed studies of significant populations, who have been engaged in medical science as a career path. Do not believe people who put forth unproven treatments that fit a political agenda or narrative, and in particular the subset who use lies as a weapon.
    Yep, that worked well for people who took Vioxx, or many of the other drugs out there that passed all kinds of clinical trials. At least hydroquinone has been in use for 50 years with no real issues.
    The vaccine Fauci wants everyone to take will have maybe 6 months of trials....no thanks! Not taking it!
    Scientist, docyor,teacher, lawyer, it doesn't matter what the title is....they are all human, , all make errors, all can be biased, and all can be bought!
    Many scientists seem to have forgotten the key to proving your theory is with experiments and facts. Now they throw out a computer model that agrees with them, stomp their feet and cry that they are scientists and know things.
    Models are wrong...the ones they used on this virus were wrong, many of the climate change ones are wrong....but yeah, let's wait for the studies on some new drug too be touted that is more expensive, possibly pushed by companies or politicians with an agenda.
    If you wait and take it.....have your lawyer and will ready.

  7. #16
    Senior Member
    Member #
    49535
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    midwest usa
    Posts
    3,470
    Liked
    4099 times
    Quote Originally Posted by unclenunzie View Post
    Believe medical professionals who cite large, peer reviewed studies of significant populations, who have been engaged in medical science as a career path. Do not believe people who put forth unproven treatments that fit a political agenda or narrative, and in particular the subset who use lies as a weapon.
    The problem is medical professionals and medical scientists are not in total agreement about it's effectiveness or lack of it, despite what the media chooses to report. There are political agendas on both sides of the argument. One particular study that the MSM focused on to say it wasn't effective and allegedly caused more harm than doing nothing was deeply flawed from a scientific standpoint, but the scientists who were critical of the study didn't get as much media coverage as the people saying "See, this proves we were right!" Some people say it's worthless, others say it's a cure. The Doctor and medical scientist that I personally know trust don't claim either of these things. Sadly the truth most of the time on these issues usually turns out not to be one extreme or the other.

  8. #17
    Senior Member
    Member #
    62881
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Benicia, Kaliforniastan
    Posts
    145
    Liked
    141 times
    If the mainstream media reporters actually saw Trump walking on water, the big headlines would say Trump can’t swim!

    Bob


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Czechbikr likes this.

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Home | Forum | Active Topics | What's New | Subscribed Threads | My Threads | My Posts

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •