Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Member
    Member #
    2255
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    47
    Liked
    0 times

    Is it just me or does the older PT92 feel more solid than the newer ones?

    I just got a 1994 Pt99AF and it is solid. I am going to pick up a newer Pt92w/rail and when handling the two the old one feels beefier. I know some of the parts on the newer ones are polymer but I dont see how that would make that much of a difference. Anybody notice this?
    Taurus SS85UL
    CZ52

  2. #2
    Member
    Member #
    5410
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    55
    Liked
    0 times

    Re: Is it just me or does the older PT92 feel more solid than the newer ones?

    Some of the parts on the newer PT92s are polymer? Really? Like what?
    Anything worth being shot is worth being shot twice.

  3. #3
    Moderator

    Member #
    107
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Rockford, Illinois
    Posts
    7,536
    Liked
    845 times

    Re: Is it just me or does the older PT92 feel more solid than the newer ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shooter in VA
    Some of the parts on the newer PT92s are polymer? Really? Like what?
    The only parts on the new PT92's that are Polymer, that I am aware of, are the Rear Sights, Recoil Spring Guide Rods, and Grips. If there are more, that would be interesting to know.
    "Easy is the path to wisdom for those not blinded by ego." - Yoda

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Member #
    1969
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    369
    Liked
    4 times

    Re: Is it just me or does the older PT92 feel more solid than the newer ones?

    I would like to see the new polymer recoil rod. Can you buy one?

  5. #5
    Moderator

    Member #
    107
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Rockford, Illinois
    Posts
    7,536
    Liked
    845 times

    Re: Is it just me or does the older PT92 feel more solid than the newer ones?

    Quote Originally Posted by adam731432
    I would like to see the new polymer recoil rod. Can you buy one?
    Call Taurus CS, ask for the Parts Department, and order it.

    As I like the Stainless Steel original Recoil Spring Guiderod, why would you want a Polymer One?
    "Easy is the path to wisdom for those not blinded by ego." - Yoda

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Member #
    1969
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    369
    Liked
    4 times

    Re: Is it just me or does the older PT92 feel more solid than the newer ones?

    I kinda like the new polymer rod that Beretta uses. They allow a little flex for better reliability. I have seen bent recoil rods jam the slide.Probably from dropping the pistol with the slide back. Also its really a non issue but a polymer one will not wear on the corresponding parts of the slide it interacts with and would create less friction. They are disposable though but cheap to replace. I would keep the stainless one for backup. I just trust polymer also as i have seen glocks go threw thousands of rounds with one. I also like the idea of a captured spring rod if the Beretta one will fit.

    I wouldn't say there better or worse. Both of them have trade offs. I have seen plastic ones chip around the head or break in half from the heat of a 1000 round non stop torture test but usually the polymer one will eject out the end and the pistol will keep running as they are really only to help assemble the spring in the gun, where a shattered or bent metal one will jam it up. I would just like to use a cheap polymer one for the bulk of shooting and keep my stainless one pristine for carry.

 

 

Home | Forum | Active Topics | What's New | Subscribed Threads | My Threads | My Posts

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

taurus pt92 feel